World’s first Nano IPS with 1MS response time (tested by UL... NVidia G SYNC compatible. Back to top ▵. The only caveat, it's much more expensive at $1,800. VA technology often gets a hard time from monitor enthusiasts who like to criticize it for being the slowest of the three main LCD variants. The HDR experience isn’t great, but response times near 6ms and adaptive sync that works with AMD and Nvidia GPUs headlines a feature set that’s outstanding for ultrawide gamers. Here is a recap of all the above mentioned monitors on Amazon: If you are a PC gamer looking at building a new gaming machine, then make sure to check out the Nvidia RTX 3080 graphics cards. Having trouble deciding between two monitors? Best FreeSync PC Gaming Monitors for the Money. Its native 144Hz refresh rate can also be overclocked to 165Hz. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account. The VX2758-2KP-MHD is not perfect, as it lacks height adjustability, backlight strobing and the top-end performance of the best IPS displays, but right now there’s no better monitor for around $300. If that’s not available for around $250, the last-gen model, the AOC CQ27G1 would be our pick of the bunch. Input lag is nearly 0, the fastest we’ve ever tested, and the adaptive sync experience is flawless. The newer and larger 38" LG 38GL950G UltraGear is the best ultrawide monitor on the market bar none. Those two concerns aside, we strongly recommend the LG 27GL850 as the best all-round 1440p gaming display on the market right now, and at $500, it's honestly quite the steal. If you want something larger, like 32-inch, you’re out of luck as the best panels at that size top out at a measly 75 Hz which we don't recommend for gaming. We’d also be on the lookout for the LG 27GN850, which is a 2020 refresh of the GL850 and might be a better deal in your region. It has an 8-bit Color Depth covering a 92% sRGB and 75% DCI-P3 Color Gamut, with an average 400cd/m2 Brightness level, giving it a HDR400 Certification, while providing a 3000:1 Contrast Ratio. If you’re looking for a large display that comes with a 1440P resolution and a 144Hz refresh rate and you don’t mind paying a premium for some nice additional features, then the Samsung C32HG70 might be an option you’ll want to consider. This is because, unlike G-Sync, AMD’s Freesync technology doesn’t require strict specifications from monitor manufacturers in order to implement onto their monitors. They are also available in a wider range of sizes at this resolution, including 32-inch models, and curved models. Unfortunately, it has terrible out-of-the-box color accuracy, so you have to get it calibrated to enjoy it to the fullest, and like most IPS panel monitors, it has a low contrast ratio and doesn't perform well in dark rooms. Naturally, there are some compromises to get here. This monitor features an advertised GTG Response Time of 1ms and is not G-SYNC Compatible. Generally speaking the AOC CQ27G2 doesn’t perform as well as the ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHD, but response times aren’t terrible and we still get a borderline true 144Hz experience. It has an 8-bit Color Depth covering a 99% sRGB and 77% DCI-P3 Color Gamut, with an average 320cd/m2 Brightness level, falling short of the minimum HDR400 Certification, while providing a 1000:1 Contrast Ratio. Not only do you need a big budget in order to accommodate it, but you also need a high-end PC to run it. If you are in that position, we’d recommend a VA display instead. LG has priced this monitor aggressively for a 32-inch gaming variant. 1. Also, check out our recommendations for the best monitors for Xbox One, the best monitors for PS4, the best G-SYNC monitors, and the best monitors for PC gaming. The differences between the 27GL850 and other 1440p IPS monitors is stark. There's no HDR support either, which is expected of a monitor in this price range. Get the Omen X 27 if you’re after a TN, and enjoy the blistering performance. Ozarc here. You quickly lose image accuracy when viewing from the side, which isn't ideal for co-op gaming. Video: Samsung Odyssey G9 Monitor Review (2020) – The Ultimate Gaming Experience? The Pixio PX7 Prime offers a 165 Hz refresh rate which may tempt some buyers, but performance is mostly the same as the Viewsonic. HP 27xq 144 Hz Quad HD Gaming Monitor (2560 x 1440) with AMD FreeSync , 1 ms Response (1 DP, … When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the purchased products locally in Montreal, Canada. They don’t deliver a bad experience, they’re still high refresh, and very responsive with low input lag, you just won’t get quite the same clarity and motion handling as higher-end monitors, which is to be expected as they’re half the price. Most 144Hz VA displays at 1440p deliver response times in the 7-8ms range or above, with some pushing 10ms. The Gigabyte M27Q offers a resolution of 2560×1440 at 144Hz, using its 27″ IPS Panel, with White LED Backlight, giving it a Pixel density of 109p/inch. Learn More. Learn More. This is the cheapest way to get a 1440p high refresh gaming monitor and various options sell for as little as $250. This is a popular budget monitor that is often out of stock, but at $320 offers unbeaten value. The Best Freesync 1440P 144Hz Monitors. Brilliant colors producing over 120% area coverage for sRGB color... 27 inch WQHD (Wide Quad High Definition) 2560 x 1440p Ultimate eSports... IPS Panel, HDR, 350nit Brightness, Increases the dynamic range between... 165Hz Refresh Rate, FreeSync (Range 48-165Hz @DisplayPort, 48-144Hz... IPS Panel, 95% DCI-P3, 10bits Color, HDR, 400nit Brightness, Increases... 27 inch WQHD (2560x1440) IPS gaming monitor with 1ms (MPRT) response... ASUS Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync (ELMB SYNC) Technology enables a 1ms... Marathon ready with ASUS Eye Care technology to minimize eye fatigue... 31.5 inch wqhd (2560x1440) 1800r curved hdr display with ultrafast... Asus extreme low motion blur sync (elmb sync) technology enables a 1ms... Marathon ready with asus eye care technology to minimize eye fatigue... 27 inches QHD (2560 X 1440) Nano IPS display. The best 1440p 144Hz monitor with an ultrawide screen is the Acer Nitro XV340CK. But gaming? For $320 it offers a 27-inch 1440p 144Hz IPS panel. Curved panels come down to personal preference, and personally I don’t like them for 16:9 displays, and uniformity can be questionable. Back to top ▵. AOC doesn’t quite pack the brand name that ASUS, Acer, and BenQ do among gamers, but they have become more well known in the past few years. Learn More. While the LG 27GL850 launched last year, it’s still one of our favorite choices for this resolution and refresh rate (read our full review). As gaming PCs and monitors have gotten more powerful, it has been a constant battle for faster refresh rates and higher resolutions. $499 on Amazon It delivers images with amazing detail and clarity, great for an immersive gaming experience. But, its TN panel will likely be the make or break point for gamers. While BenQ’s ZOWIE XL2730 is quite a bit more expensive than Nixeus’ EDG27S, it does have some features that help it stand out. VIOTEK GFV27DAB 27-Inch Gaming Monitor |... Pixio PX277 Prime 27 inch 165Hz IPS HDR... LG 27GL850-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD Nano... SAMSUNG 27-inch Odyssey G7 - QHD 1000R... ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080... MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 10GB GDRR6X... Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080 EAGLE OC 10G... GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING OC 10G... EVGA 10G-P5-3881-KR GeForce RTX 3080 XC3... EVGA 10G-P5-3883-KR GeForce RTX 3080 XC3... EVGA 10G-P5-3885-KR GeForce RTX 3080 XC3... Nvidia RTX 3070 vs AMD RX 6700 XT Benchmark, AMD RX 6500 XT vs RX 5500 XT Benchmark Comparison, AMD RX 6700 XT vs RX 5700 XT Benchmark Comparison. User Reviews: Those two concerns aside, we strongly recommend the LG 27GL850 as the best all-round 1440p display on the market right now, and at $500, it's honestly quite the steal. Not everyone has the cash to throw at high-end IPS displays, so the next best option is a VA panel. Although this is advertised as a “1ms” monitor, performance is equivalent to TN displays that also advertise “1ms,” which is impressive any way you look at it. And if you’re looking to spend $400 to $500 which is where most of the best 1440p 144Hz monitors sit, here’s what we’d be looking at. It’s our favorite gaming monitor. It has a 8-bit Color Depth covering a 100% sRGB and 88% DCI-P3 Color Gamut, with an average 250cd/m2 Brightness level, falling short of the minimum HDR400 Certification, while providing a 3000:1 Contrast Ratio. Gamers should expect somewhat-near-sRGB accuracy out of the box and a very bright display, which leads to a good viewing experience with solid, vibrant colors. The only realy differences between the PG278QR and the XB271HU (spec-wise) are the XB271HU’s 144Hz refresh rate versus the PG278QR’s 165Hz refresh rate and the XB271HU’s IPS panel versus the PG278QR’s TN panel. Viewsonic VX2758-2KP-MHD 27" or AOC CQ27G1/G2 This is coupled with great color quality, including 95% P3 coverage, excellent viewing angles and a nice flat panel. So, unless this monitor goes on sale, you could get the PG278QR for less. In actual fact, my current 4K 60p 48″ TV also has a Pixel Density of 109p/inch and its crystal clear, sitting about 2 feet away from it as I type this. Case in point, we can find flagship gaming monitors priced as low as $500, with budget offerings dipping below $400 for the first time. The 32-inch LG 32GK650F (read our full review) once held our best value 1440p monitor spot. Although this is advertised as a “1ms” monitor, performance is equivalent to TN displays that also advertise “1ms,” which is impressive any way you look at it. It uses a cheaper panel, so it ends up providing more mid-range to entry-level performance. However, the monitor just hit the market and pricing is still not where we want it to be. And, while the TN panel might not offer as good of viewing angles as an IPS panel, it will deliver a faster response time. AMD also has a similar technology (FreeSync), but if you have an NVIDIA graphics card already, your only option to take advantage of variable refresh rate technology is by pairing it with a G-Sync monitor. It offers one DisplayPort and HDMI port, as well as two USB 3.0 ports. Price: With a 165Hz refresh rate, only it, its sibling (the PG278QR), and the ViewSonic XG2760 offer a refresh rate faster than 144Hz on a 2560×1440 monitor. The differences between the 27GL850 and other 1440p IPS monitors is stark. It offers a higher level of detail, with almost twice the number of pixels of standard 1080p screens, and motion looks great, thanks to the fast refresh rate. We’ve yet to test it, but it uses the same panel as the 27GL850, so by all reports it performs roughly the same. The ASUS PG27VQ is over $200 more experience than the GN32DR at the moment.